Download pdf The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3
Download pdf The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3
The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 by Georgetown University Law
---------------------------------------------------------------
Author: Georgetown University Law
Page Count: 42 pages
Published Date: 12 Sep 2013
Publisher: Theclassics.Us
Publication Country: United States
Language: English
ISBN: 9781230294186
Download Link: The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3
---------------------------------------------------------------
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1916 edition. Excerpt: ... that the excavation was insufficiently protected. A motion by the city to make the property owned a party defendant was denied. Held, that it was error to deny the motion; that though, ordinarily, where recovery is bad against one joint tort-feasor there is no right of action over against the other tort-feasor, there are exceptions to the rule; that the present case comes within one of said exceptions, namely, where the negligence of one party is the antecedent and efficient cause of the injury and the negligence of the other party is negative.--Guthrie vs. City of Durham, 84 S. E. 859 (North Carolina, April 7, 1915). Trial--Improper Argument Of Counsel. In an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant's servant in driving an automobile against the plaintiff's automobile, held that it was highly improper for plaintiff's counsel to say, while arguing to the jury, "We also have the testimony of the physician for the indemnity insurance company," but that the court's action in charging the jury to disregard this statement prevented the statement from being reversible error.--Walling vs. Portland Gas & Coke Co., 147 Pac. 399 (Oregon, March 30. 1915). The appellate court held that while a willful attempt by the plaintiff in a personal injury case to get before the jury the fact that the defendant is protected by indemnity insurance is reversible error, still if that fact is brought out by the plaintiff while cross- examining the physician to show his motives and interest, no blame can attach to counsel. BOOK REVIEWS. Limitations On The Treaty--Making Power Under The ConstiTution OF The United States. By Henry St. George Tucker, Boston: Little, Brown and Company. It is impossible...
Read online The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 Buy and read online The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 Download and read The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 ebook, pdf, djvu, epub, mobi, fb2, zip, rar, torrent Download to iPad/iPhone/iOS, B&N nook The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 ebook, pdf, djvu, epub, mobi, fb2, zip, rar, torrent
The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 by Georgetown University Law
Author: Georgetown University Law
Page Count: 42 pages
Published Date: 12 Sep 2013
Publisher: Theclassics.Us
Publication Country: United States
Language: English
ISBN: 9781230294186
Download Link: The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3
---------------------------------------------------------------
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1916 edition. Excerpt: ... that the excavation was insufficiently protected. A motion by the city to make the property owned a party defendant was denied. Held, that it was error to deny the motion; that though, ordinarily, where recovery is bad against one joint tort-feasor there is no right of action over against the other tort-feasor, there are exceptions to the rule; that the present case comes within one of said exceptions, namely, where the negligence of one party is the antecedent and efficient cause of the injury and the negligence of the other party is negative.--Guthrie vs. City of Durham, 84 S. E. 859 (North Carolina, April 7, 1915). Trial--Improper Argument Of Counsel. In an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant's servant in driving an automobile against the plaintiff's automobile, held that it was highly improper for plaintiff's counsel to say, while arguing to the jury, "We also have the testimony of the physician for the indemnity insurance company," but that the court's action in charging the jury to disregard this statement prevented the statement from being reversible error.--Walling vs. Portland Gas & Coke Co., 147 Pac. 399 (Oregon, March 30. 1915). The appellate court held that while a willful attempt by the plaintiff in a personal injury case to get before the jury the fact that the defendant is protected by indemnity insurance is reversible error, still if that fact is brought out by the plaintiff while cross- examining the physician to show his motives and interest, no blame can attach to counsel. BOOK REVIEWS. Limitations On The Treaty--Making Power Under The ConstiTution OF The United States. By Henry St. George Tucker, Boston: Little, Brown and Company. It is impossible...
Read online The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 Buy and read online The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 Download and read The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 ebook, pdf, djvu, epub, mobi, fb2, zip, rar, torrent Download to iPad/iPhone/iOS, B&N nook The Georgetown Law Journal Volume 3 ebook, pdf, djvu, epub, mobi, fb2, zip, rar, torrent